The Meaning of Citizenship

The Meaning of Citizenship Essay The Meaning of Citizenship according to the author is what we wanton it mean. What a bunch of malarkey The history of how the interpretation of citizenship has evolved was well d unrivalled tho I kept having this imprint that she was trying to get me to subscribe to close to new world order of citizenship. I like the Dictionary definition of citizenship is the state of being vested with the rights, privileges, and du casts of a citizen. The character of an individual viewed as a member of society behavior in terms of duties, obligations, and functions of a citizen.She suggested that citizenship was scratchy from the rattling beginning of the United soils. Yes it was because we were on the whole immigrants from the start. Women were still forecastn a space to their husband, Africans was slaves, Native the Statesn conquered, and a lot of old world racism was in full swing. America was the great experiment by its entry fathers. Never had it been tried to bring all hatful together as one country of citizens, well at least what they con sloper as people at that clipping.Some may argue that the romans were doing the same thing notwithstanding they were doing it at sword point then by volunteer. Even though some of the founding father was still behind in their cerebration other(a)s were not. They build the constitution so that future generations could learn from their fathers mistake and improve America for everyone. I was very surprise that the dictatorial Court did not rule that the power of husbands over wives is no lasting recognizable in law until 1992. Wow that took 216 years to figure that step to the fore.Also that if a woman got married to a noncitizen she would lose her citizenship and be seen as a citizen of her husband country unless on the flip side of the coin if the wife married an American husband they became a US citizen until the law change in 1934. Currently the married spouse has the weft to e ither become a permanent residence or naturalization. naturalisation is no easy task either. Under the Path to citizenship on the U. S. Citizenship and in-migration Services the spouse has to take a naturalization test. Sad sidetrack according to US News and World Report Weekly pollard done back in April of 2012 1 in 3 Americans would croak this test.Another big issue today is illegal women having kidskinren in the United State in order to not to get deported. This loop-hole has become to be cognise as baby anchor. In a way they stumble citizenship though the kids. Many countries pay off up closed this loop-hole and I phone it quantify for America to do so too. I would give amnesty to all kids and p atomic number 18nts here now then set a deadline date 10months out that one of the child parents is moldiness be a U. S. Citizen otherwise that child will be consider as the citizen of one of the parent immaterial citizenship.The history close to race factor on citizenship w as pretty such(prenominal)(prenominal) dead on. Of all the nationalities from around the world the people from African have had it the worst. Even till this day I dont see why people looked down on Africans. African American has had the hardest time integrate in to American society. It was mostly because their in-migration was forced to America by slavery. When they won their freedom they were still treated like second class citizens. Even today most of the culture seems torn about where they fit into America society. The Chinese and Japanese were treated just as badly.They were seen as rats or beasts to use till they dropped over dead. If anything they werent raze seen as human beings. They fought back hard to earn their rights and somehow travel forward as a culture to integrate with American society. and so the author goes into class warfare for three pages. Most of it did not exercise sense other then she trying to make the argument that complaisant security is some kind so cial citizenship. Now the way I see it with immigration most moving from one country to another(prenominal) are lower or poor people. When they move into a very well off country they can bear the cost of it.America is at a point where immigration is collapsing local government fiances. More people are pulling from the system then put in. The states along the Mexican border are suffering majorly from this due to illegal immigration. Immigration is a good thing for a country but it must be controlled. In Europe many countries are having negative birth rate meaning more people are dying faster than babies are born. In a capitalism economy they build the social course of study are design to be funded by future population get under ones skin who pay into the social program.The problem is that most of their growth now is from immigration that are almost doubling unemployment in European country but benefiting from the host country social programs. (See http//www. migrationpolicy. org/pu bs/TCM-integration. pdf) Linda Kerber once again starts to ramble on for another five pages. It covers the Boston Tea Party, Dred Scott decision of 1857, Yick Wo the laundry goof vs. Hopkins, War Brides Act of World War II, and a few other Supreme Court rulings to support her views, California Proposition 187, the Cold War, Iran-Contra, Vietnam War, the disconnection War, and something about Peter Pan vs.Captain Hooker. Well not that last thing. every last(predicate) of this was a setup to give you a right hook to the cope about her post national citizenship idea. And so she opens up with Do we aim citizenship? This is where the final punch gets you. She starts to make hidden points to being a one world citizenship because like as she stated from the start citizenship means what we make it mean. This will not work as many cultures that have such polar views of each other.An example would be that Islam faith is so tie into it governing system that is Islamic law which is set by the trust is law via in United State religion is kept obscure from government laws. She is right that we are one world family but we have it off under different homes with different rules and values. To me illegal immigration is like having the unwelcome family member visits you. They say they are only going to be visit for 3 days but end up staying for years. We cant just join with other people if they dont deliberate in the Bill of Rights created by our founders.What would be the point of freedom of the hale if you cant write about something that will offend a person or group? In the end I think most people keep mixing citizenship and culture together. Becoming a citizenship must mean more then I was able to skid into this land. We must close the loop-holes in immigration to remove some of the arguments on citizenship but not eliminate immigration itself. We have to end this feeling of it means whatever it means to you. Its a cop out. We must stand firm that this is what i t takes to be a citizen of the United States.